VeroLab green coffee grading device on a laboratory bench

Green coffee grading.
Made objective.

Accurate results Rapid analysis Sharable records

/one sample, one record

One sample in. A shared record out.

VeroLab scans each bean and turns visible defects, screen size, and color into a quality record your team can inspect, compare, and share.

/daily workflow

Load. Scan. Know what is in the sample.

360°

Views per bean

Each bean is captured all the way around, and every view feeds the final result.

Up to 500 g

Sample size

From a few beans to a complete grading sample.

5 minutes

Typical analysis time

Typical analysis time for a standard sample.

Multiple protocols

Grading protocols

SCA, COB, NY, GCA are currently supported.

/sample results

More than a defect count.

Every analysis becomes a structured record that can support quality, operational, and commercial decisions.

01

Screen sizes

Bean count, percentage, and estimated weight for each screen-size group.

02

Visible defects

Good and defective bean counts, percentages, estimated weights, and protocol conversion.

03

Color

RGB and CIELAB information for the complete sample and each defect category.

04

Calculated properties

Calculated bean volume, with estimated weight and density.

Screen sizes Size distribution
by weight
<13 · 5.69% <13
13 · 3.87% 13
14 · 5.18% 14
15 · 9.87% 15
16 · 15.06% 16
17 · 21.12% 17
18 · 21.15% 18
19 · 10.20% 19
20+ · 7.87% 20+
Visible defects SCA defects
by class
24.31%
175 classified defects 64 FBE
  • Broken / chipped / cut / flat 7.92%
  • Part black 5.69%
  • Full black 3.47%
  • Hull / husk 2.64%
  • Shell / ear 1.53%
  • Parchment 1.11%
  • Cherry / pod 0.83%
  • Foreign matter 0.62%
  • Withered 0.35%
  • Full sour 0.15%
Colour analysis RGB and CIELAB
n = 722
Average colour #635C45
R 99
G 92
B 69
CIELAB distribution of the sample: every bean plotted in 3D by a*, b* and L*, each point carrying its own colour
/evidence

A result you can open.

Click into any defect category and see the actual beans behind it. Review all bean views, the confidence scores, and the final label.

When a bean is ambiguous, the uncertainty does not disappear behind a final number. Your team can see it, discuss it, and provide feedback.

Bean-level review

Part Black

Final label
Part Black bean, view 1 of 3
View 1 31%
Part Black bean, view 2 of 3
View 2 99%
Part Black bean, view 3 of 3
View 3 74%

The black area is only visible from one side. The strongest view carries the final label.

Closest alternative: Full Black

Real VeroLab bean captures. View scores shown for illustration.
VeroLab on a café counter, ready to analyse the next sample
/across the supply chain

Quality data should travel with the coffee.

Keep offer, pre-shipment, and arrival samples connected. Compare changes in screen-size distribution, visible defects, and color without losing the evidence behind the numbers.

  • Link the samples Use the sample ID or select records manually.
  • See what changed Review differences in defects, size, color, and estimated weight.
  • Share the record Use the result in internal reviews, supplier discussions, or claims documentation.

Sample comparison supports professional review. It does not claim to prove that two samples are identical or that fraud has occurred.

/where VeroLab fits

Different decisions. The same evidence.

Green coffee producer inspecting finished coffee before export
/use case 001

Producers and exporters

Check finished green coffee before shipment and identify deviations while there is still time to act.

Relevant uses Finished-product checks · Processing control · Pre-shipment records · Buyer specifications

Coffee trader reviewing incoming green coffee samples
/use case 002

Importers and traders

Verify whether incoming coffee matches the grade purchased and document supplier discussions with bean-level evidence.

Relevant uses Arrival checks · Sample comparison · Claims · Supplier monitoring

Roastery quality laboratory preparing green coffee for cupping
/use case 003

Roasters and Q Labs

Move repetitive grading out of the cupping bottleneck and keep Q Graders on sensory work.

Relevant uses Incoming checks · Physical grading before cupping · Consistent internal criteria

/offer

Tell us how you grade. We’ll make the offer.

Tell us where VeroLab will be used, how many samples you analyze, which grading protocols you follow, and which systems or services you need.

We will review the request and send a formal modular offer by email.